Overview
Alaska Native self-determination.
Split-Estate Conflict
After the EVOS, conservation purchases created split estates, where the public owns the surface and Chugach holds dominant subsurface rights. This has led to long-running conflict and regulatory barriers.
Federal Findings
Congress directed a federal study in 2019 (Dingell Act). The 2022 report confirmed the conflicts but recommended only a partial remedy.
Legislative Solution
S.2016 and H.R. 3903 establish the framework to fully resolve the EVOS-related split-estate conflict, supporting conservation outcomes while restoring economic opportunity and cultural stewardship.
The Issue
After the devastating oil spill in 1989, the EVOS Trustee Council used settlement funds to purchase large areas of Native Village corporation surface estate for conservation. Those lands were deeded to federal and state agencies, or encumbered with restrictive conservation easements, while Chugach retained dominant subsurface ownership. This split-estate structure created an inherent land management conflict that continues today.
Because Chugach’s subsurface rights are dominant, exercising those rights can require navigating extensive federal and state processes, adding complexity and cost that was not envisioned when Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) lands were conveyed.
Why the Land Exchange Matters
A complete land exchange would:
What the Land Exchange Accomplishes
S.2016 and H.R. 3903 (Chugach Alaska Land Exchange Oil Spill Recovery Act of 2025) continue the congressionally authorized effort initiated by the 2019 Dingell Act and responds to the federal government’s confirmation of the conflict in the 2022 study.
The bill:
Public Benefit
This exchange advances the public interest by:

